EHASS - Emanate - Highlights from the Drug Abuse and Addiction Studies Sessions

Editorial Independence

Emanate - Highlights from the Drug Abuse and Addiction Studies Sessions (EHASS) emphasizes editorial independence, free from undue influence by sponsors, aligning with COPE’s Core Practices. 

Peer Review Policy

EHASS employs rigorous peer review for all submissions, with either single or double-blind processes. Reviewers are selected based on expertise, publication history, and knowledge, while avoiding conflicts of interest. 

Peer Review Workflow

EHASS allows organizers/volume editors to use any manuscript management system but mandates adherence to global peer review standards.

Manuscript Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers assess manuscripts on originality, methodological soundness, consistency, relevance, and adherence to technical specifications.

Editorial Responsibilities

EHASS’ editorial team adheres to COPE guidelines, ensuring content originality and accuracy, which is crucial for WoS inclusion.

Transparency and Recognition in Peer Review

Ethical Adherence

All parties involved in the publication process must align with EHASS’ Ethical and Peer Review Policies. This is essential for WoS, which demands high ethical standards.

Content Responsibility

The responsibility for content, perspectives, and recommendations lies solely with the authors, which is a standard practice in academic publishing.